Bayard’s Notebook, 130
Court of Common Pleas of Delaware, Kent County.
December, 1795.
After the plaintiff had gone through his evidence the defendant moved for a nonsuit. The plaintiff’s counsel, discovering that there was no replication and the cause therefore not at issue, moved to discharge the jury, which was done upon citing Str. 1117 and the State v. Ferris in New Castle Supreme Court where the same thing had been done.
Ridgely for plaintiff. Miller and Bayard for defendant.
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…