Bayard’s Notebook, 246.[*] STATE v. HILL et al. Court of Quarter Sessions of Delaware, Sussex County. April 26, 1799. [*] This case is also reported in Wilson’s Red Book, 237; Rodney’s Notes, April 27, 1799. Upon argument the Court held that the Attorney General was entitled to separate costs against each defendant. Bayard for State. […]
Articles Tagged: 246
BROWN LESSEE v. STAYTON, 1 Del. Cas. 232 (1799)
Wilson’s Red Book, 246 LESSEE of CHARLES BROWN et al. v. WILLIAM STAYTON. Supreme Court of Delaware, Sussex County. October 11, 1799. Page 233 Bayard and Ridgely for plaintiffs. Broom and Wilson for defendant. Defendant’s counsel had taken defense for so much of defendant’s patent, called “Puzzle,” as lay westward of a patent to George […]
STIDHAM v. JAQUET AND NIVIN, 2 Del. Cas. 583 (1820)
Ridgely’s Notebook III, 246 ISAAC STIDHAM v. THOMAS JAQUET and SAMUEL NIVIN, Administrator of Peter Jaquet, the younger. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. September 6, 1820. Page 584 Injunction bill on the report of arbitrators in the Court of Common Pleas. . . . This case went off on a compromise. The […]
CLOUD v. CLOUD’S ADMINISTRATOR, 1 Del. Cas. 471 (1799)
Bayard’s Notebook, 246 CLOUD v. CLOUD’S ADMINISTRATOR. Supreme Court of Delaware, New Castle County. April, 1799. Bond was payable at the end of one year, and no interest reserved. Jury gave a verdict for the principal and no interest. Page 472 Question was whether they could deny interest after the bond was payable. Verdict was […]
CLEMENT v. THE CHESAPEAKE AND D. C. CO., 3 Del. Cas. 183 (1827)
Ridgely’s Notebook V, 246 CLEMENT, BLACKSTOCK, and VAN SLYK v. THE CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL COMPANY. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. March 8, 1827. [Bill in Chancery.] [Read for complainant. Bayard, McLane and Rogers for defendants.] A question arose between the counsel of the parties respectively, whether the defendants should begin and […]