Wilson’s Red Book, 183 WILLIAM HOWARD, Minor, v. WOOLSEY ROBINSON. Court of Quarter Sessions of Delaware. November, 1797. Page 165 Petition by an apprentice for a discharge. It was admitted that the indentures had been signed and sealed by the apprentice, his mother, and master in the presence [of] John Warrington, a magistrate, and many […]
Articles Tagged: 183
SORDEN v. HOOPER, 1 Del. Cas. 638 (1814)
Clayton’s Notebook, 183 JAMES SORDEN v. HOOPER, HOPKINS et al. Supreme Court of Delaware. March, 1814. An old survey, never returned, coming among title papers and accompanied with possession, [held] evidence of a title. The surveyor’s hand was proved by comparison. Clayton and Brinckle pro querentem. Hall and Vandyke for defendants. Page 639
NORRIS v. DAUPHIN’S ADMINISTRATORS, 1 Del. Cas. 639 (1814)
Clayton’s Notebook, 183 J. W. NORRIS, Administrator of J. Summerl, v. J. DAUPHIN’S ADMINISTRATORS. High Court of Errors and Appeals of Delaware. August, 1814. Appeal from a decree of the Chancellor. In August Term, 1813, the death of the appellant Summerl, who was defendant below, was suggested on the record and a rule was obtained […]
ROGER’S EXECUTORS v. WILLIAMS’ ADMIN’X., 1 Del. Cas. 640 (1814)
Clayton’s Notebook, 183 DANIEL ROGER’S EXECUTORS v. DAVID WILLIAMS’ ADMINISTRATRIX. High Court of Errors and Appeals of Delaware. August, 1814. The question was, whether the death of Williams’ administratrix could be suggested, and the administrator de bonis non of Williams be made a party. PER CURIAM. There is no difference in this respect between a […]