No. 389, 2001Supreme Court of Delaware.
Decided: February 1, 2002
Court Below-Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 00A-09-008.
AFFIRMED.
Unpublished Opinion is below.
SAJID L. SYED, Claimant/Appellant Below-Appellant, v. HERCULES, INC., Employer/Appellee Below-Appellee. No. 389, 2001 Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Decided: February 1, 2002
Court Below-Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 00A-09-008.
Before HOLLAND, BERGER and STEELE, Justices
Carolyn Berger, Justice:
ORDER
This 1st day of February 2002, the Court has considered the appellee’s motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds it manifest on the face of the appellant’s opening brief that the appeal is without merit for the reasons stated by the Superior Court in its well-reasoned decision dated July 16, 2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee’s motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.