No. 82, 1999.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: June 9, 1999.
Decided: June 21, 1999.
Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, C.A. No. 95C-10-153.
ORDER
This 21st day of June 1999, the Court has considered the appellee’s motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and does not find it to be manifest on the face of the appellant’s opening brief that the appeal is without merit under the criteria set forth in Rule 25(a).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee’s motion to affirm is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
S/MAURICE A. HARTNETT, III,
Justice
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…