PROSPERO v. STATE, 832 A.2d 1251 (Del. 2003)

SEAN PROSPERO, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

No. 496, 2002Supreme Court of Delaware.
June 19, 2003

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County Cr. ID No. 0003024092

APPEAL DISMISSED

Unpublished Opinion is below

PROSPERO v. STATE, 496 (Del. 6-19-2003) SEAN PROSPERO, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. No. 496, 2002 Supreme Court of Delaware. June 19, 2003

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County Cr. ID No. 0003024092

ORDER
E. Norman Veasey, Chief Justice

This 19th day of June 2003, it appears to the Court that on March 4, 2003, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

Page 1252