Bayard’s Notebook, 202
Supreme Court of Delaware, Sussex County.
October, 1797.
Upon motion to set aside the verdict made on behalf of the defendant, there was proof offered that the jury, after they had gone from the bar, had received evidence which the Court rejected. To repel the proof, the plaintiff’s counsel produced the affidavits of some of the jury, which, upon the objection of the counsel for the defendant, Court would not allow to be read. Cases cited by defendant’s counsel were 1 Term 11, 2 Bl.R. 804. For the plaintiff, 2 Barnes 438, 2 Morg.Ess. 25, 46.
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…