No. 427, 2005.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: November 8, 2005.
Decided: January 26, 2006.
Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, File No. CN03-07837, Petition Nos. 03-15081, 05-15823.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.
ORDER[1]
CAROLYN BERGER, Justice.
This 26th day of January 2006, the Court has considered the appellee’s motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds it manifest on the face of the appellant’s opening brief that the appeal is without merit for the reasons stated by the Family Court in its decisions dated July 5, 2005 and August 15, 2005. We find no error or abuse of discretion on the part of the Family Court in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee’s motion to affirm is GRANTED. The judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED.
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…