Clayton’s Notebook, 26
Supreme Court of Delaware, New Castle County.
November, 1805.
It was in this case determined that the charge of a cash item on a book of original entries regularly and fairly kept cannot be recovered where the only evidence to support the action is the book supported by the oath of the party; nor admitted as a set off under the Act about defalcation, [1 Del. Laws 162,] because the payment of money is not a matter properly chargeable in an account, within the meaning of the Act concerning contracts and assumptions, 1 Del. Laws 328.
[NOTE.] SO it was said by the Court in Smith and Brown v. McBeath, Administrator of Lowber, November Term, 1814, “Cash items are not properly chargeable in account.”ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…