NICOTRA v. ROWE, 765 A.2d 952 (Del. 2000)

ALEX T. NICOTRA, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. KAREN ROWE, RICHARD ROWE and JAMES A. FUQUA, JR., Defendants Below, Appellees.

No. 188, 2000.Supreme Court of Delaware.
November 1, 2000.

Appeal from Court of Chancery, Sussex County, CA 2023-S.

AFFIRMED.

Unpublished Opinion is below.

ALEX T. NICOTRA, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. KAREN ROWE, RICHARD ROWE and JAMES A. FUQUA, JR., Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 188, 2000. In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: October 31, 2000. Decided: November 1, 2000.

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County C.A. No. 2023-S

Before WALSH, BERGER, and STEELE, Justices.

ORDER
This 1st day of November 2000, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, the Court concludes that the Court of Chancery did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and in dismissing appellant’s petition as frivolous. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Chancery is affirmed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:. Joseph T.Walsh Justice

O’MAYES V. STATE