No. 546, 2003.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: March 9, 2004.
Decided: May 12, 2004.
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, C.A. No. 18245.
Before HOLLAND, BERGER and STEELE, Justices.
RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice.
This 12th day of May 2004, the Court having considered this matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its memorandum opinion dated October 14, 2003.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…