IMRAN v. HARRIS, 827 A.2d 30 (Del. 2003)

MOHAMMAD IMRAN, M.D., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. GEORGE A. HARRIS, JR., GRACIE P. HARRIS, individually and as personal representatives of the ESTATE OF GRACEALYNN T. HARRIS, and next friend of SHAWN A. HARRIS, a minor, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees.

No. 184, 2002.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: June 25, 2003.
Decided: June 26, 2003.

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 99C-09-138

Affirmed

Unpublished opinion is below.

MOHAMMAD IMRAN, M.D., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. GEORGE A. HARRIS, JR., GRACIE P. HARRIS, individually and as personal representatives of the ESTATE OF GRACEALYNN T. HARRIS, and next friend of SHAWN A. HARRIS, a minor, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees. No. 184, 2002 Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: June 25, 2003 Decided: June 26, 2003

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.

ORDER
E. Norman Veasey, Chief Justice:

This 26th day of June 2003, the Court, having carefully considered the decision and judgment of the Superior Court dated February 14, 2003, together with the briefs of the parties and their contentions in oral argument, and Appellees’ motion to expand the record together with Appellant’s response, has determined as follows:

(1) Appellees’ motion to expand the record is denied.
(2) To the extent that (a) the issues raised on appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the factual findings; (b) the errors alleged on appeal are asserted to be an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; and (c) the issues raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by settled Delaware law, which was properly applied.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

(A) Appellees’ motion to expand the record is DENIED.

(B) The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.