No. 58, 2000.Supreme Court of Delaware.
Decided: May 28, 2000
Superior (Sussex) CA 00M-01-029
Appeal dismissed.
Unpublished Opinion is below.
LAVAR GIDDENS, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee. No. 58, 2000. In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: April 25, 2000 Decided: May 28, 2000
Appeal from Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, Cr.A. No. 00M-01-029
Before CAROLYN BERGER, Justice.
Carolyn Berger, Justice.
ORDER
This 24th day of May 2000, the Clerk having issued a notice dated April 25, 2000, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), for his failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix; and appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…