GARNESKI v. TEROMINA, 832 A.2d 1251 (Del. 2003)

FRANCIS GARNESKI and KAREN GARNESKI, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants v. CORINE TEROMINA, Defendant Below, Appellee.

No. 147, 2003.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: August 5, 2003.
Decided: September 5, 2003.

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 98C-11-302 JEB.

AFFIRMED

Unpublished Opinion is below

GARNESKI v. TEROMINA, 147, (Del. 2003) FRANCIS GARNESKI and KAREN GARNESKI, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants v. CORINE TEROMINA, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 147, 2003. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: August 5, 2003. Decided: September 5, 2003.

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 98C-11-302 JEB.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, and BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.

ORDER
Jack B. Jacobs Justice

This 5th day of September, 2003, upon considering the parties’ briefs, it appears that the Order of the Superior Court of the State of Delaware denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial did not constitute an abuse of discretion, and should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons set forth in, the Court’s Opinion dated February 25, 2003, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.