No. 513, 2005.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: February 20, 2006.
Decided: March 6, 2006.
Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 02C-01-058.
ORDER
HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice.
This 6th day of March, 2006, the Court has considered the appellees’ respective motions to affirm or dismiss this appeal. The appellants failed to file a response to the motion to dismiss as required by Supreme Court Rule 30. Accordingly, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed. See Supr. Ct. R. 3(b)(2)(a). The motion to affirm is moot.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…