No. 524, 2010.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: November 17, 2010.
Decided: January 14, 2011.
Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Kent County, Cr. ID 0008008225.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND
and BERGER, Justices.
ORDER
RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice.
This 14th day of January 2011, after careful consideration of the opening brief, motion to affirm, and record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the Superior Court’s order dated July 20, 2010. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the sole claim raised in appellant’s third motion for postconviction relief was both untimely and repetitive[1] and that appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles. Moreover, the second argument raised in appellant’s opening brief was previously adjudicated and reconsideration is not warranted in the interest of justice.[2]
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.