Categories: Delaware Court Opinions

BAHLITZANAKIS v. ROBINSON, 27 A.3d 550 (Del. 2011)

DIMITROIS and MARIA BAHLITZANAKIS, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Below-Appellants/Cross Appellees, v. WILLIAM A. ROBINSON, CHU PAO ROBINSON, and MENG ROBINSON Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Below-Appellees/Cross Appellants.

No. 103, 2011.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: July 25, 2011.
Decided: August 16, 2011.

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for Kent County, C.A. No. 06C-12-029.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER
HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice.

This 16th day of August 2011, having considered the briefs filed by the Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Dimitrios and Maria Bahlitzanakis, and the Appellees/Cross-Appellants, William A. Robinson, Chu Pao Robinson, and Meng Robinson, the Court concludes that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s February 7, 2011 Order.[1] The Superior Court did not err in interpreting the lease agreement and its factual findings are supported by the record.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

[1] Bahlitzanakis v. Robinson, 2011 WL 441336
(Del. Super. Feb. 7, 2011).

jdjungle