No. 453, 2005.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: April 21, 2006.
Decided: June 21, 2006.
Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, Cr. ID 0006017660.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and BERGER, Justices.
ORDER
RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice.
This 21st day of June 2006, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record below, we find it manifest that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s well-reasoned opinion dated August 29, 2005. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, which included six claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, lacked substantive merit.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
ROBERT LYONS Defendant Below, Appellant, v. DBHI, LLC, KURT T. BRYSON and RHONDA BRYSON Defendants…
TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. ELON R. MUSK, X HOLDINGS I, INC., and X HOLDINGS II,…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
Re: Twitter, Inc., v. Elon R. Musk et al. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM.Court of Chancery of…
179 A.3d 824 (2018) CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, New York City Employees' Retirement System,…
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY L. FLONNORY, Defendant. Cr. ID. No. 9707012190 SUPERIOR COURT…